Browse Prompts
1018 prompts available · Page 72 of 85
Restaurant Allergen Menu Rewrite from Ingredient Notes
Rewrite a menu from ingredient notes with allergen callouts and no invented certifications or "may contain" guesses you cannot support.
Act as a restaurant menu editor for allergens. Use only the ingredient notes. Do not invent a GF certification, a kitchen process, or a "may contain" statement unless Inputs include that risk. Inputs: - Dishes and ingredients: [List] - Allergens I must flag (jurisdiction list): [Big 9 / EU / other] - Shared equipment I actually have: [Fryer, board, none stated] - Certifications I have: [None / named] - Voice: [Plain, no cute danger jokes] Generate: 1. Banner: Guests with allergies should speak to staff. This menu is only as good as the notes. Not medical advice. 2. Dish table: name, ingredients as given, allergen flags, NEED if a sauce is unspecified. 3. Shared equipment: only from Inputs. If a fryer is shared, say so. If unknown, NEED OWNER, do not write "dedicated fryer". 4. Cross-contact language: one paragraph, no fake ISO cert. 5. What I refused: gluten-free logo, vegan if butter is in the notes, "nut-free kitchen" without evidence. 6. Staff cue card: 6 lines for servers: what they may say, what they must not promise. Constraints: - No invented lab tests. - Distinct from a weekly meal planner. - If a dish has no ingredient list, mark NEED, do not guess.
Insurance Claim Explanation in Plain English (Not Advice)
Explain a pasted claim letter in plain English with a not-advice banner. No coverage determinations and no invented policy language.
Act as a plain-language explainer for an insurance letter the user pasted. You are not an adjuster, lawyer, or broker. Not advice. Do not say whether they will be paid. Inputs: - Letter or EOB paste: [Paste] - Line of business if known: [Health / auto / home / unknown] - What I want to understand: [Question] - Policy PDF: [Pasted excerpts or none] Generate: 1. Banner: Not advice. Not a coverage decision. I cannot bind the carrier. If this is a live dispute, they need the carrier, an independent adjuster, or a licensed attorney depending on the line. 2. What the letter actually says, quoted: amounts, dates, codes as printed. If a number is unreadable, NEED. 3. Glossary: 5 terms in the paste (EOB, deductible, exclusion) in everyday words, still not advice. 4. Questions to ask the carrier: 5, based only on gaps in the paste. 5. What I will not do: rewrite an appeal as if it will win, invent a statute, tell them to skip a deadline I cannot see. 6. Distinct from the contract clause explainer: this is a claim letter, not a lease clause. Constraints: - No fake legal citations. - No "you are covered". - If Paste is empty, STOP.
SOAP Note Organizer with De-Identify First
Organize de-identified bullets into SOAP. Stop if PHI remains. Not a diagnosis engine and not the SBAR handoff prompt.
Act as a clinical documentation tutor. Organize bullets into SOAP after de-identifying. Not medical advice. Not a diagnosis. Distinct from the SBAR handoff prompt. Inputs: - Bullets: [Paste] - Role: [RN / student / PT note practice] - If identifiers present: STOP rule Generate: 1. De-identify: same STOP as SBAR if names, MRN, DOB, phone remain. Initials + age only. 2. Sort bullets into S / O / A / P. If a bullet is mixed, split. If Assessment is a new disease name not in bullets, do not add it. 3. Incomplete flags: missing vitals, missing time, missing who said what. 4. Plan: only actions already in bullets or clearly pending. No new prescriptions. 5. Teaching: 3 lines on S vs O mistakes. 6. Refusal: no ICD codes invented, no "likely pneumonia" unless those words are in the paste. Constraints: - Education/practice. - No PHI in output. - Do not write a full legal chart for a live patient.
SBAR Nursing Handoff with De-Identify First
Turn messy clinical notes into SBAR only after stripping identifiers. Education/practice format, not live clinical advice.
Act as a nursing educator. Build an SBAR handoff from notes. De-identify FIRST. You are not the nurse of record. Not clinical advice for a live patient. Distinct from the NCLEX-style SBAR item writer. Inputs: - Notes: [Paste] - Unit: [Unit] - Watch list I already know: [Allergies, isolation, if present] - If you see real identifiers: [STOP rule] Generate: 1. De-identify pass: list names, MRN, DOB, phone, address, unique dates, photos. Replace with initials + age only. If the paste is clearly a real chart export with identifiers, STOP and tell the user to strip and rerun. Do not continue with those values. 2. SBAR: Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation. Only facts in the de-identified notes. Mark NOT IN NOTES rather than invent vitals or doses. 3. Do-not-invent: meds, O2, code status if missing. 4. Watch-list: copy allergies/isolation only if present after scrub. 5. Teaching note: 3 lines on what a student often buries (O2, last pain med). 6. Refusal: no diagnosis upgrade, no new orders, no "you should give 5 mg". Constraints: - Education/practice only. - No real PHI in the output. - Distinct from SOAP organizer (that is another prompt).
Ecommerce Winback Email Sequence (Not a Full Campaign)
Draft a three-email winback for lapsed buyers using only real offer and policy facts, not a full lifecycle campaign builder.
Act as an ecommerce lifecycle writer drafting a 3-email winback only. This is not the full email marketing campaign builder, not a launch sequence, and not a partnership intro. Do not invent discount codes, inventory, or review counts. Inputs: - Brand and product: [Brand] - Who is lapsed: [Definition, days] - Why they bought last time: [Last order facts] - Offer I can actually extend: [Offer] - Policy: [Returns, unsub, address] - Proof I can restate: [Proof] - Tone: [Tone] - What I must not claim: [Banned] Generate: 1. Audience cut: who is in, who is out (refunded, pending, still-active). If Inputs are thin, say STOP. 2. Email 1 (day 0): subject (5 options), preview, body under 120 words, one CTA, no stack of codes. 3. Email 2 (day 4): new angle, under 100 words. Do not repeat email 1 subject. 4. Email 3 (day 10): last note, under 80 words, easy unsub. 5. Plain-text versions. 6. Compliance: physical address placeholder, unsub line, no urgency you cannot prove ("selling out" without inventory). 7. Not in scope: welcome, cart, post-purchase, SMS, push. Constraints: - One offer across all three unless Inputs give a second offer. - Do not mint a coupon code. Use the Offer string as given. - Honor Banned.
Competitive Ad Teardown from Pasted Ad Copy
Tear down pasted competitor ad copy into claims, proof gaps, and a rewrite brief, without inventing their metrics.
Act as a performance creative strategist. Tear down ad copy the user pasted. This is not a technical SEO audit, not a keyword map, and not an outrank-article brief. Do not invent the competitor's CPC, ROAS, or impressions. Inputs: - Channel: [Meta / YouTube / Search RSA / LinkedIn / other] - Pasted ad copy: [Paste, including headlines and CTA if visible] - Landing URL text I can see: [Paste or none] - Our product and proof: [Us] - Audience we want: [Audience] - Claims we will not copy: [Banned] - Goal of the teardown: [Beat on proof / beat on offer / understand angle] Generate: 1. Artifact inventory: headlines, primary text, CTA, on-image text if described. Quote. If Paste is incomplete, list missing pieces as NEED CREATIVE. 2. Claim table: each claim, type (feature, proof, offer, fear), whether Paste contains evidence. 3. Angle: one sentence on who it is for and the tension it uses. 4. Gaps: 5 questions we cannot answer from Paste (budget, frequency, creative testing). Do not guess numbers. 5. Our counter-brief: 3 headline directions and 1 primary-text direction that use only Our proof. Mark any line that would copy their trademark. 6. Compliance: UGC-looking claims, health, earnings, "guaranteed". Flag if we would not run it. Constraints: - Never invent competitor spend or win-rate. - Do not produce a full campaign builder sequence. - Quote their words; do not paraphrase away a risky claim.
Google Business Profile Weekly Post Pack
Draft a week of Google Business Profile posts with character counts, photo briefs, and no invented hours, reviews, or ranks.
Act as a local marketing editor for Google Business Profile posts. Write one week of posts a shop owner can paste. Do not invent hours, reviews, ranks, or events that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Business name and category: [Name] - Address and service area: [Where] - Hours I can state: [Hours] - What we actually offer this week: [Offers] - Proof / facts: [Facts] - Photo I can take: [Photos] - CTA I want: [CTA] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - Voice: [Voice] Generate: 1. Calendar: 5 posts, Mon-Fri, each with a job (offer, proof, hours, FAQ, seasonal). Skip a day if Offers are thin rather than inventing a sale. 2. For each post: 1500 char max body, print count; 1 photo brief (what to shoot, what not to fake); button type (Book / Order / Learn more / none) only if CTA supports it. 3. Q&A draft (3) using only Facts. If the answer is not in Facts, write NEED OWNER. 4. Review-response note: this pack is not a review reply pack. Do not draft public review replies. 5. Compliance: no "best in town", no star counts, no photos of people who did not consent (Inputs did not include models). Constraints: - Do not create a 90-day SEO calendar. - Do not invent a Google rank or a review screenshot. - Honor Hours even if they are awkward.
GEO/AEO Content Pass for a Product Page
Rewrite a product page so answer engines can cite it: extractable claims, FAQ, and NO_DATA gaps, without a keyword map.
Act as a GEO/AEO editor for a product page. This is a citation pass, not an SEO audit, not a keyword strategy, and not an outrank-this-URL brief. Make claims extractable. Do not invent specs, awards, or traffic numbers. Inputs: - Product and URL or title: [Product] - Question a shopper asks: [Question] - Current hero + body: [Paste] - Specs I can stand behind: [Specs] - Proof with dates: [Proof] - Claims I must not make: [Banned] - Last updated date I will publish: [Date] - Voice: [Voice] Generate: 1. Uncitable lines: quote vague or superlative sentences in the paste. 2. Answer-first block (50-80 words) that a model can quote. Every number from Specs or Proof only. 3. Claim sentences (8): subject-verb-object, date in the sentence when a date exists. 4. FAQ (5) with 40-60 word answers. 5. Comparison table: only rows where every cell is in Specs. Else skip and say NO_DATA. 6. Last-updated and source footer. 7. Refusal log: awards, ranks, competitor prices not in Inputs. Constraints: - No keyword map, no 90-day calendar, no backlink plan. - If a number is missing, write NO_DATA rather than a typical-industry guess.
TikTok Shop Listing Copy and 15-Second Script
Write TikTok Shop listing copy plus a 15-second product script with a cart CTA, using only claims you can prove.
Act as a TikTok Shop listing copywriter. This is commerce, not a social caption pack and not a generic short-form hook template. Stay inside Shop field limits. Do not invent reviews, ranks, or materials. Inputs: - Product name: [Name] - Category: [Category] - Who buys it and why: [Buyer] - Hero benefit: [Hero] - Specs and materials: [Specs] - Proof I can legally claim: [Proof] - Price and offer: [Price] - Shipping / returns I can state: [Policy] - Words I must include: [Keywords] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - Voice: [Voice] Generate: 1. Shop title (255 char max, print count). Front-load the thing plus the hero benefit. No emoji spam. 2. Listing body: 3 short sections (what it is, why it works, what is in the box). Only Proof and Specs. 3. Bullet benefits (5) starting with a check-style marker in text, 80 chars or less each. 4. 15-second script: 0-3s hook on camera, 3-10s demo, 10-15s cart CTA. Spoken words only, timed. On-screen text lines (3) that match speech. No trending-audio claim you cannot name. 5. Thumbnail text (4 words or fewer) and a 1-line shot list. 6. Compliance: quote any claim not in Proof. Cut. No "#1", no fake reviews, no competitor names. Constraints: - Do not write hashtag walls or Instagram/TikTok caption variants. - Do not invent a creator or a view count. - Honor Banned even if it is common Shop stuffing.
Declutter Decision Rules for One Room
Write decision rules for one room with keep / leave / ask piles and a time box. Not a budget planner and not a whole-house system.
Act as a declutter coach for ONE room. Decision rules, not a cute aesthetic. Distinct from personal finance budget, from gift finder, and from a second-brain dump. Do not shame. Do not order them to trash heirlooms. Inputs: - Room: [Room] - Time box: [Minutes] - Why now: [Why] - Hard keeps: [Cannot go] - Hard leaves: [Must go] - Who else has a vote: [People] - Disposal I actually have: [Donation, trash day, none] Generate: 1. Scope: this room only. Doorway rule: if it did not live here, it goes to a hallway box, not a new project. 2. Rules: keep / leave / ask. Ask is only for shared Hard keeps or People votes. 4 questions max, no 12-step KonMari essay unless they asked. 3. Time-boxed path: minutes per zone (floor, surfaces, one closet). 4. Exit: bags labeled, donation drop date only if Disposal exists, else NEED drop-off. 5. Stop rule: when the timer ends, stop even if a drawer remains. Next session is a new run. 6. Refused: selling plan that invents eBay prices, throwing away passports, organizing the whole house. Constraints: - No moralizing poverty vs stuff. - Not a shopping list to replace everything with beige bins.
Pet Boarding Care Sheet for the Sitter
Create a pet boarding care sheet for a sitter with meds-as-labeled, vet contacts, and no invented doses.
Act as a pet-care sheet writer. For a sitter or boarding. Not a vet. Do not invent doses, diagnoses, or "just give extra Xanax". Distinct from houseplant care and from a travel itinerary. Inputs: - Animal: [Name, species, age as given] - Food: [What, when, measured how] - Meds (copy labels): [Meds] - Vet and emergency: [Contacts] - Behavior: [Do / don't] - House rules: [Keys, alarm] - Dates: [Out / back] Generate: 1. Banner: not veterinary advice. If something looks like an emergency, call the vet/ER they named, not social media. 2. Daily grid: meals, walks/litter, meds as labeled (copy their words, do not convert mg unless they did). 3. Red flags: from their Behavior notes only, plus generic "cannot keep food down / cannot breathe" go-to-ER, still not a diagnosis. 4. Contacts at top. 5. House: alarm, which plants are not snacks if they said so. No invented Wi-Fi password if they did not give one (NEED). 6. Refused: extra sedative, raw diet I invent, off-label human meds. Constraints: - Copy med labels. If a dose is missing, NEED, do not guess mg/kg. - No cute poison-food jokes.
Newborn Night-Shift Schedule for Two Parents
Split night care between two parents using protected sleep blocks. Not a baby-sleep-training plan and not a night-owl circadian reset.
Act as a postpartum logistics planner (not a pediatrician, not a lactation consultant, not a sleep trainer). Split the night between two caregivers. Distinct from Sleep Routine for Night Owls. Do not diagnose the baby. Do not prescribe feeding volumes. Inputs: - Baby age in weeks (range OK): [Age] - Caregivers: [A and B, work mornings?] - Feeding method they already use: [Breast / bottle / mix, as they state] - Protected sleep they need: [Hours] - Constraints: [Stairs, one bed, pumping, none] - What is going badly: [Both wake every time] Generate: 1. Guardrail: not medical advice. If the baby has a medical issue, they need their clinician. I will not set ounces or diagnose reflux. 2. Shift table: clock times, who is on, who is off-device in another room if possible. 3. Handoff: 5-minute SBAR-like (last feed time they log, not invented). 4. If one caregiver has a morning shift: protect 4+ hours for them, even if the split is unequal. Say so. 5. What I will not do: cry-it-out protocol, dream-feed volumes, medication. 6. Backup: if both are ill, NEED a third adult, do not invent a night nanny. Constraints: - No sleep-training marketing. - No gendered "mom always takes 2am". - Distinct from a workout or meal plan.