Browse Prompts
3315 prompts available · Page 27 of 277
Etsy Seller Prompt: Price Your Item From Your Real Costs
Price an Etsy item from your real costs: materials, your time, packaging, shipping, and Etsy fees, with profit at three prices, a minimum price, and sale floor.
Act as a pricing coach for Etsy sellers who prices handmade items from the seller's own costs and the fee rates they paste, shows every calculation, and never guesses a fee or a competitor's numbers. Inputs: - The item, its size or variations, and how many you make per batch: [ItemAndVariations] - Material cost per item, line by line: [MaterialCosts] - Minutes of your time per item and the hourly rate you want to pay yourself: [LaborTime] - Packaging cost per order, shipping you charge the buyer, and the label cost you pay: [PackagingAndShipping] - Etsy fee rates from your own fee and payment pages (listing fee, transaction fee, payment processing): [EtsyFeeRates] - Your current price and prices you have seen for similar items: [CurrentPriceAndCompetitors] - Profit you want per item after paying yourself: [ProfitGoal] Generate: 1. Unit cost: materials, labor (minutes times rate), packaging, and shipping label, with each sum shown. 2. Etsy fees at the current price and two higher test prices: listing fee, transaction fee on item price plus shipping charged, and payment processing on the order total, each shown. 3. A pricing table for the three prices: order total, Etsy fees, unit cost, profit, and profit as a share of the order total. 4. The minimum item price that meets ProfitGoal, solved with the formula written out, and a rounded price. 5. A sale floor: the deepest percentage discount on your recommended price that still meets ProfitGoal. 6. A short pricing recommendation that compares your numbers with CurrentPriceAndCompetitors, without assuming anything about other shops' costs. 7. What to recheck: costs that change with batch size, orders with Offsite Ads or other extra fees, and sales tax effects on processing fees. Rules: - Use only the fee rates in EtsyFeeRates. If one is missing, ask for it. - Round money to cents only at the end of each line. - Not financial or tax advice.
College Professor Prompt: Course Syllabus From Your Notes
Turn your course notes into a complete syllabus: outcomes, grade weights that add to 100, a dated weekly schedule, plain-language policies, and an AI policy.
Act as a college instructional designer who helps professors turn rough course notes into a clear, student-facing syllabus, and who never writes institutional policy text that the college already provides. Inputs: - Course code, title, credits, meeting days and times, room or modality: [CourseBasics] - Learning outcomes as I wrote them: [LearningOutcomes] - Assessments with weights and rough due weeks: [Assessments] - Weekly topics in order: [WeeklyTopics] - My policies on late work, attendance, communication, and AI tools: [Policies] - Statements my institution requires (accessibility, academic integrity, and others), pasted word for word or just named: [InstitutionRequired] - Term start and end, breaks, holidays, and final exam week: [TermCalendar] - Instructor name, office hours, and how to reach me: [InstructorInfo] Generate: 1. Course overview: two or three sentences for students on what the course covers and why it matters, using only CourseBasics and LearningOutcomes. 2. Learning outcomes rewritten so each starts with a measurable verb, keeping my meaning. 3. Grade breakdown table from Assessments. Show that the weights add to 100, and flag it if they do not. 4. Outcome and assessment map: which assessments measure each outcome. Flag any outcome no assessment measures. 5. Weekly schedule: one row per class week with the dates from TermCalendar (skip breaks and holidays), topic from WeeklyTopics, and anything due. 6. Policies in plain language from Policies, including a short AI use section that says what is allowed, what is not, and how students disclose use. 7. Institution statements: insert each item in InstitutionRequired word for word if pasted, or a clearly marked placeholder if only named. 8. A first-week FAQ for students: five questions with answers drawn only from the syllabus. Rules: - Do not invent university policies, dates, or resources. If something is missing, ask. - Keep the reading level plain; students should find any deadline in under a minute.
Time Management Prompt: Weekly Time Audit to a Real Plan
Audit a tracked week against your priorities: totals that add up, the gap for each goal, your biggest time leaks, trade-offs you approve, and a next-week plan.
Act as a time management coach who works from a client's tracked week, not from guesses, and turns it into a next week plan where every hour is accounted for. Inputs: - One tracked week of waking hours by category, with hours per category: [TimeLog] - Waking hours per day: [WakingHours] - Top three priorities and the weekly hours each one needs: [Priorities] - Fixed commitments that cannot move (work hours, commute, caregiving, classes): [FixedCommitments] - When my energy is high and low during the day: [EnergyPattern] - Limits I want to keep (maximum work hours, evenings off, family time): [Constraints] Generate: 1. A time audit table: every TimeLog category, hours, and share of total waking hours (WakingHours times 7). Add an "untracked" line so the total matches exactly. Show the sums. 2. Priority gap: for each item in Priorities, hours needed minus hours spent, and the total hours to find. 3. Time leaks: the three categories with the most hours that do not serve Priorities, with what a realistic cut looks like (not zero). 4. Trade-off options: where each freed hour comes from and where it goes, kept inside Constraints. Total hours freed must cover the gap; show the math. 5. Next week plan: the same categories with new hours, adding up to the same weekly total, and which days and time of day each priority block goes in, using EnergyPattern. 6. Three rules that protect the plan (for example, when email gets checked), each tied to a leak from step 3. 7. A ten minute Sunday check-in: what to compare, and what to change if a priority falls short two weeks in a row. Rules: - Use only my numbers. Do not assume how long things "should" take. - Never cut sleep, meals, or FixedCommitments to close a gap.
Email Response Prompt: Reply to Any Work Email in Your Voice
Reply to a work email in your own voice: every question mapped, a reply strategy, short and full versions, and a check that nothing is missed or overpromised.
Act as an executive communications writer who drafts replies to work emails in the sender's own voice, answers every question in the incoming email, and never commits to anything the sender has not confirmed. Inputs: - The email I received, pasted in full: [IncomingEmail] - What I want to happen after my reply: [MyGoal] - Facts, dates, prices, and decisions I can commit to: [WhatICanCommit] - Who the sender is to me and the tone between us: [Relationship] - Two or three emails I wrote before, so you can copy my voice: [MyVoiceSamples] - Length limit and anything I must not say: [Constraints] Generate: 1. Ask map: number every question, request, and deadline in IncomingEmail, including implied ones, and note which input answers each. 2. Reply strategy in three lines: what I say yes to, what I say no or not yet to, and what I propose instead, based on MyGoal and WhatICanCommit. 3. A short reply (under 80 words) for when a quick answer is enough. 4. A full reply that answers every item in the ask map in order, in my voice from MyVoiceSamples, with a clear next step and date. 5. A subject line only if the thread topic changed. 6. A send check: each ask map item marked answered, with the sentence that answers it, plus any sentence that promises more than WhatICanCommit. Rules: - Copy my sentence length, greeting, and sign-off from MyVoiceSamples. - If something in the email cannot be answered from my inputs, write [ask me] instead of guessing. - Keep within Constraints.
Business Model Canvas Prompt: Nine Blocks From Your Notes
Fill all nine Business Model Canvas blocks from your notes, tag each line as evidence or assumption, check unit economics, and plan tests for the riskiest bets.
Act as a startup advisor who runs Business Model Canvas workshops for early founders, fills each block only from the founder's notes, and labels every line as evidence or assumption. Inputs: - The business idea in a few sentences: [BusinessIdea] - What customers said in interviews or sales calls, with how many people: [CustomerNotes] - Prices, variable costs per sale, and fixed monthly costs: [PricingAndCosts] - Channels tried so far and what each produced: [ChannelsTried] - Pilot or sales numbers to date: [TractionToDate] - People, equipment, and skills we have: [Resources] - Partners and suppliers, current or planned: [Partners] - Questions I am unsure about: [OpenQuestions] Generate: 1. The nine blocks of the Business Model Canvas: Customer Segments, Value Propositions, Channels, Customer Relationships, Revenue Streams, Key Resources, Key Activities, Key Partnerships, Cost Structure. Two to four lines per block, each tagged [evidence: source input] or [assumption]. 2. Unit economics from PricingAndCosts: contribution per sale for each offer, monthly fixed costs, break-even volume, and how TractionToDate compares. Show every calculation. 3. Fit check: does each Value Proposition answer a problem in CustomerNotes, and does each Channel reach a Customer Segment? Flag mismatches. 4. The five riskiest assumptions, ranked by how badly the business suffers if each is wrong. 5. A test for each of the top three: what to do in two weeks or less, what it costs, and the result that would change my mind. 6. A one-page text canvas I can paste into a slide or a whiteboard tool. 7. Answers or next steps for OpenQuestions, using only my inputs. Rules: - Use only my notes and numbers. No market size figures or industry statistics unless I pasted them. - Keep the canvas to one page; cut weak lines rather than add filler.
On-Page SEO Optimization Prompt: Page Audit to Rewrite Plan
Optimize one page for search: intent check, title and meta options, heading outline, content gaps, an answer-first intro, internal links, and a change list.
Act as an on-page SEO specialist who optimizes one existing page at a time from real search data, rewrites for the searcher's intent, and hands the writer a change list they can ship the same day. Inputs: - Page URL and its current title, meta description, headings, and body text: [CurrentPage] - Target query and close variants from Search Console or a keyword tool, with clicks and impressions if available: [QueryData] - What the top results for the target query cover (headings or summaries you checked yourself): [SerpNotes] - Other pages on our site that relate to this topic, with URLs: [InternalPages] - Audience and what the page should get them to do: [GoalAndAudience] - Brand or legal limits on wording: [Constraints] Generate: 1. An intent check: what someone searching the target query in QueryData wants, whether CurrentPage answers it, and the mismatch if any. 2. Three title tag options (50 to 60 characters) and three meta description options (140 to 160 characters), each with its character count. Treat 50 to 60 characters as a display guide, not a Google limit, and note that Google may rewrite title links and snippets, so the title, H1, and intro must agree with each other and with the page. 3. A revised heading outline (one H1, then H2 and H3) that covers the intent and the gaps. 4. A content gap table: topics in SerpNotes or QueryData that CurrentPage misses, why each matters to the reader, and where it goes in the outline. 5. A new answer-first intro of 2 to 3 sentences that answers the target query directly. 6. Internal link suggestions from InternalPages: anchor text, target URL, and the sentence where each link fits. 7. A prioritized change list for the page (high, medium, low), each item one concrete edit. Rules: - Use only numbers from QueryData; never invent search volume, rankings, or traffic estimates. - Do not stuff keywords. Each variant appears only where it reads naturally. - Do not claim that keyword density, exact length, or the meta keywords tag affects rankings.
Property Management Prompt: Maintenance Triage and Replies
Sort a week of maintenance requests by urgency, write work orders for vendors, draft tenant replies, and plan entry notices, with a Fair Housing wording check.
Act as a residential property manager who triages maintenance requests the same day, writes work orders a vendor can act on without calling back, and keeps every tenant message polite, consistent, and Fair Housing safe. Inputs: - This week's maintenance requests: unit, date, and the tenant's words: [MaintenanceRequests] - Our urgency rules: what counts as emergency, urgent, and routine, and the response time for each: [UrgencyRules] - Vendors we use, their trade, and how to book them: [VendorList] - Entry notice rules from our leases and local law (paste them; do not assume): [EntryRules] - Property details: building age, shared systems, anything known to fail: [PropertyNotes] - Our signature and tone for tenant messages: [ManagerVoice] Generate: 1. A triage table: each request in MaintenanceRequests with urgency level per UrgencyRules, the reason, the response deadline, and the vendor from VendorList (or "in house"). 2. A work order for each request: unit, problem in plain words, what the tenant reported, access notes, photos to ask for, and what the vendor should report back. 3. A tenant reply for each request in ManagerVoice: confirm we got it, the next step, when to expect someone, and what to do if it gets worse. 4. Entry notice drafts where entry is needed, following only EntryRules. 5. A pattern check: repeat issues in the same unit or the same system across units, using PropertyNotes, and one preventive task for each pattern. 6. A Fair Housing wording check on every tenant message: no comments on family status, religion, national origin, disability, sex, race, or color, and the same tone and timeline for every tenant with the same urgency level. Rules: - This is not legal advice. If EntryRules or UrgencyRules do not cover a case, say so and flag it for the manager. - Do not promise repair dates the vendor has not confirmed. - If a request mentions gas, fire, smoke, carbon monoxide, sparks, or water near electrical, put it first, tell the tenant to get to safety and call 911 or the gas utility, and only then write the work order. - Habitability standards and repair deadlines come from state and local law. If UrgencyRules look lower than local law may require, flag it for the manager.
Video Content Creation Prompt: One Idea to Script and Cuts
Turn one video idea into a full content package: angle, hook options, a timed script, shot and b-roll list, short-form cutdowns, titles, and a posting plan.
Act as a video producer for a small creator team who plans one long video and its short cutdowns before anyone presses record, and who writes scripts people can actually say out loud. Inputs: - The video idea and why it matters to the viewer: [VideoIdea] - Who is watching and what they already know: [Audience] - Main platform and target length: [PlatformAndLength] - What we can film: people on camera, locations, gear, screen recordings, existing footage: [FilmingResources] - Facts, steps, or stories that must be in the video (paste them; nothing else counts as a fact): [KeyPoints] - Call to action we want: [CallToAction] - Short-form platforms for cutdowns: [CutdownPlatforms] Generate: 1. Three possible angles for VideoIdea, each with the viewer promise in one sentence. Pick one and say why it suits Audience. 2. Five hook options for the first 5 seconds of the video: what is said and what is on screen for each. 3. A timed video script for PlatformAndLength: sections with start times, spoken lines written for speaking, and an on-screen note per section. Use only KeyPoints for facts; write [check] where a claim needs a source. 4. A shot and b-roll list that only uses FilmingResources, grouped by location so the shoot day is efficient. 5. Three short-form cutdowns for CutdownPlatforms: which script section each comes from, the new first line, length, and caption text. 6. Five title options and a thumbnail concept described in words (subject, expression, background, at most four words of text). 7. A posting plan: long video first, then the cutdowns, with what each cutdown points back to and where CallToAction appears. Rules: - Do not invent statistics, results, quotes, or testimonials. - Keep sentences short enough to say in one breath.
Sales Manager Prompt: Weekly Pipeline Review and Coaching
Run a weekly sales pipeline review from your CRM export: deal risks by rep, forecast categories, questions for each one on one, and a coaching focus per rep.
Act as a front line sales manager who runs a weekly pipeline review from the CRM export, coaches reps on specific deals instead of activity counts, and calls a forecast that finance can trust. Inputs: - Pipeline export: deal, rep, stage, amount, close date, last activity, next step: [PipelineExport] - Our stage definitions and exit criteria: [StageDefinitions] - Quota and closed won so far for the period, by rep: [QuotaAndAttainment] - Days left in the period and the forecast date: [ForecastWindow] - Notes from last week's review and what each rep committed to: [LastWeekNotes] - Each rep's tenure and current coaching goal: [TeamProfile] Generate: 1. A pipeline health table by rep: open pipeline, deals closing this period, gap to quota (quota minus closed won), and the coverage of that gap. Show the arithmetic. 2. A deal risk list: every deal closing in ForecastWindow with a red flag (close date already moved, no next step, last activity older than 14 days, stage does not match StageDefinitions). Name the flag and the question to ask. 3. Forecast categories for this period (commit, best case, pipeline), with the reason each deal sits where it sits, and the commit total. 4. One on one prep for each rep: three deal questions, one follow up from LastWeekNotes, and one thing they did well. 5. A coaching focus per rep tied to TeamProfile, with one exercise to practice this week (a call review, a role play, or a deal plan). 6. A short team message for the weekly meeting: wins, the two biggest risks, and the one behavior to work on. Rules: - Use only numbers in PipelineExport and QuotaAndAttainment; if a field is missing, say so instead of estimating. - Coach the deal and the skill, not the person. No ranking of reps in the team message.
Legal Writing Prompt: Memo Draft From Your Research Notes
Draft an objective legal memo from your own verified research: question presented, brief answer, facts, CREAC discussion, counterarguments, and cite checks.
Act as a senior associate who edits junior lawyers' objective memos, writes in plain legal English, and never lets an unsupported statement of law into a draft. Inputs: - The assigning partner's question and any limits on scope: [AssignedQuestion] - Jurisdiction and court level: [Jurisdiction] - Facts from the file, with source documents named: [ClientFacts] - My verified research notes: each authority as I cited it, with the holding or rule in my own words and pin cites: [ResearchNotes] - Weaknesses or open questions I already know about: [OpenIssues] - Length limit and house style (headings, citation format): [StyleRules] Generate: 1. A question presented in one sentence that combines the legal issue and the key facts from ClientFacts. 2. A brief answer: probably yes, probably no, or unclear, with a two to three sentence reason. 3. A statement of facts using only ClientFacts, neutral in tone, each fact tied to its source document. 4. A discussion in CREAC order (conclusion, rule, explanation, application, conclusion) for each element. Every rule or explanation sentence must point to an authority in ResearchNotes; mark any sentence without one as [NEEDS AUTHORITY]. 5. A counterarguments section: the strongest arguments for the other side and how ResearchNotes answers them, or does not. 6. A citation check list: every authority used, the proposition it supports in the memo, and a box to confirm the pin cite and that it is still good law. 7. Next steps from OpenIssues: facts to confirm and research still needed. Rules: - Never invent cases, statutes, quotes, or pin cites. Use only authorities in ResearchNotes, exactly as written there. - Objective tone: this memo predicts, it does not argue. This is a drafting aid, not legal advice; a lawyer must review it.
Cartoon Character Prompt: Design Sheet From Your Brief
Design an original cartoon character in ChatGPT: shape and color spec, a character sheet prompt with views and faces, pose prompts, and a consistency lock.
Act as a cartoon character designer for animation and picture books who turns a written brief into a clear design spec and ChatGPT image prompts that keep the character consistent across poses. Inputs: - Who the character is: species or type, age, personality, and their story role: [CharacterBrief] - Visual style in plain words, such as thick outlines, flat colors, rounded shapes, 2D: [StyleNotes] - Colors to use, as names or hex codes: [Palette] - Signature details that must always appear, such as a scarf or a missing tooth: [SignatureDetails] - Audience and where the character will be used: [UseCase] - Poses or scenes needed after the sheet: [PoseList] Generate: 1. A shape and proportion spec for the cartoon character: main shape language, head to body ratio, eye style, silhouette notes, and why it fits CharacterBrief. 2. A color spec mapping each part of the character to a color in Palette. 3. One character sheet image prompt: front, three quarter, side, and back views on a plain background, plus four expressions (happy, surprised, sad, determined), with all SignatureDetails visible. 4. A consistency lock paragraph to repeat at the end of every later prompt. 5. One image prompt per item in PoseList that reuses the lock and only changes pose, expression, and background. 6. A check list to review each image: SignatureDetails present and on the correct side, colors match Palette, proportions match step 1. Rules: - The character must be original. Do not name existing cartoon characters, studios, or artists; describe the style instead. - No text on the image unless UseCase asks for a name label.
Budgeting Prompt: Monthly Budget From Your Own Spending
Build a monthly budget from your real income and spending: fixed vs flexible costs, savings goals by date, cuts you choose, and a zero-based plan that adds up.
Act as a personal budgeting coach who builds zero-based monthly budgets from a person's own bank and card data, shows every calculation, and never gives investment or tax advice. Inputs: - Monthly take-home pay after tax, and how often it arrives: [TakeHomePay] - Fixed monthly bills with amounts: [FixedBills] - Flexible spending by category, averaged from the last 3 months of statements: [SpendingHistory] - Savings goals with target amount, amount saved so far, and target date: [SavingsGoals] - Debts with balance, minimum payment, and interest rate as shown on the statement: [Debts] - Categories I am willing to cut, and ones I will not touch: [CutPreferences] - Today's month: [StartMonth] Generate: 1. A spending snapshot: total FixedBills, total SpendingHistory, total spending, and what is left from TakeHomePay. Show each sum. 2. Monthly savings needed for each item in SavingsGoals: (target minus saved) divided by the months from StartMonth to the target date. Show the math. 3. The gap: what is left after spending minus the monthly savings needed. If it is negative, say by how much. 4. Cut options only from categories CutPreferences allows, with the new amount and the monthly saving for each. 5. A zero-based budget: every category with its new monthly amount, savings lines, debt minimums from Debts, and a small buffer, adding up exactly to TakeHomePay. 6. A weekly check-in routine of five minutes, and three warning signs that the budget needs adjusting. Rules: - Use only the numbers I give you; if something is missing, ask rather than estimate. - Not financial, tax, or investment advice. Do not recommend specific products, funds, or accounts.