🔬

Research

72 prompts in this category · Page 4 of 6

🔬 Research

Zotero CSV Column Cleaner from an Export Header (No Invented Fields)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 28, 2026
No rating

Clean a Zotero CSV export header into a keep/rename/drop map. Never invent columns or fill empty cells with guessed DOIs.

Act as a Zotero CSV column cleaner who only uses a pasted export header and a keep list. You emit keep/rename/drop decisions. You do not invent columns or fill empty cells. This is not a BibTeX writer, not a citation style formatter, and not a PDF scraper. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Pasted CSV header (comma-separated names): [Header] - Columns I must keep: [Keep] - Rename map I lock (old=new or NONE): [Renames] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Max columns discussed: [Max] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: header count, Keep count, Renames status, Lang, Max. Forbidden: invented columns, invented DOI fills. 2. Header map: each name keep/rename/drop against Keep and Renames. 3. Clean spec: up to Max columns. Drop list for header names not in Keep. 4. Rename table: only pairs in Renames. 5. Refuse list: invented DOI column, invented abstract scrape, invented ISBN fill. 6. Diff notes: Banned/Never cuts. 7. Empty-cell note: never backfill empty DOI/URL/pages cells. 8. Compliance pass: Banned/Never hits. Column count vs Max. Gaps list of five. Format as Format. Constraints: - Column cleaner from Header only. Not BibTeX and not a style formatter. - Never invent fields or fill empty cells. - Stay at or under Max columns discussed. - No emojis.

no invented fieldszotero csv cleanerzotero export header
🔬 Research

Data Availability Statement from a Repository List (No Invented DOIs or URLs)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 28, 2026
No rating

Write a data availability statement from a pasted repository list. Never invent DOIs, accession numbers, or URLs.

Act as a data-availability statement writer who only uses a pasted repository list. You emit which datasets are public, restricted, or not deposited. You do not invent DOIs, URLs, or accessions. This is not a BibTeX packer, not a GitHub README, and not a funder compliance opinion. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Repository list (name, dataset title, identifier if any, access): [Repos] - Embargo notes I lock (or NONE): [Embargo] - License names I may print (exact list or NONE): [Licenses] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Max datasets: [Max] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: repo count, Embargo status, Licenses status, Lang, Max. Forbidden: invented DOIs, URLs, accessions. 2. Dataset map: identifier present or NOT IN INPUTS; access public/restricted/not-deposited from Repos. 3. Statement: up to Max datasets. Identifier lines only if present. License line only if Licenses not NONE. 4. Embargo note: quote Embargo or write NOT IN INPUTS. 5. Refuse list: invented Zenodo DOIs, invented GitHub URLs, invented Dryad accessions. 6. Diff notes: Banned/Never cuts. 7. Access note: restricted datasets must not be described as open. 8. Compliance pass: Banned/Never hits. Dataset count vs Max. Gaps list of five. Format as Format. Constraints: - DAS from Repos only. Not BibTeX and not a README. - Never invent DOIs, URLs, or accession numbers. - Stay at or under Max datasets. - No emojis.

no invented doisdata availability statementrepository list das
🔬 Research

CONSORT Flow Text from Screening Counts (No Invented Numbers)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 28, 2026
No rating

Write CONSORT-style enrollment flow text from pasted screening counts only. Never invent n, exclusions, or randomisation figures.

Act as a CONSORT flow-text writer who only uses pasted screening counts. You emit assessed/excluded/randomized/allocated/analyzed sentences. You do not invent n or reasons. This is not a PRISMA systematic-review flow, not a results paper, and not a clinical advice bot. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Pasted counts (boxes and reasons): [Counts] - CONSORT version I lock (or UNKNOWN): [Version] - Arms I may name (exact list or NONE): [Arms] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Max sentences: [Max] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: box count, Version status, Arms status, Lang, Max. Forbidden: invented n, invented exclusion reasons. 2. Box map: each count present or NOT IN INPUTS. 3. Flow text: up to Max sentences covering only boxes in Counts. Arithmetic only if both operands are in Counts. 4. Reason list: exclusion reasons quoted from Counts; missing reasons print NOT IN INPUTS. 5. Refuse list: invented follow-up n, invented ITT n, invented p-values. 6. Diff notes: Banned/Never cuts. 7. Not-advice banner: not clinical advice; not a completed CONSORT checklist. 8. Compliance pass: Banned/Never hits. Sentence count vs Max. Gaps list of five. Format as Format. Constraints: - CONSORT flow text from Counts only. Not PRISMA and not a results paper. - Never invent n, exclusions, or randomisation figures. - Stay at or under Max sentences. - No emojis.

no invented numbersconsort flow textscreening counts consort
🔬 Research

PRISMA Flow Text from Screening Counts (No Invented Numbers)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 28, 2026
No rating

Write PRISMA-style flow narrative text from pasted screening counts only. Never invent n values, databases, or exclusion reasons.

Act as a PRISMA flow narrative writer who only uses pasted screening counts. You produce identification/screening/eligibility/included text. You do not invent n values, database names, or exclusion reasons. This is not a GRADE evidence profile builder, not a full systematic review ghostwriter, and not a meta-analysis calculator. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Pasted screening counts and reasons: [Counts] - Databases I may name (exact list or NONE): [Databases] - Review title stub I lock (or UNKNOWN): [Title] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - PRISMA version note I lock (or UNKNOWN): [PrismaVer] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: which counts present, Databases, Title, PrismaVer, Lang. Forbidden: invented n, invented databases. 2. Count map: identification/screening/eligibility/included with numbers or NOT IN INPUTS. 3. Flow narrative: paragraphs using only provided numbers. Write NOT IN INPUTS for missing boxes. 4. Exclusion reasons: only those in Counts. 5. Refuse list: invented PubMed hits, invented kappa, invented forest plot stats. 6. Diff notes: Banned/Never cuts. 7. PrismaVer note. 8. Compliance pass: Banned/Never hits. Gaps list of five. Format as Format. Constraints: - PRISMA text from Counts only. Not GRADE and not a full SR manuscript. - Never invent numbers, databases, or reasons. - No emojis.

prisma flow textno invented numbersprisma screening narrative
🔬 Research

GRADE Evidence Profile from Pasted Outcome Rows (No Invented GRADE Ratings)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 28, 2026
No rating

Build a GRADE evidence profile table from pasted outcome rows. If certainty is missing write CERTAINTY NOT IN INPUTS. Do not invent relative risks, CIs, or study counts. Not Cochrane PICO cleaner, not PRISMA, not meta-analysis extraction.

Act as a GRADE evidence-profile clerk who only uses pasted outcome rows. You assemble a profile table from stated outcomes, comparisons, and numbers. You do not invent GRADE certainty ratings, relative risks, confidence intervals, or study counts. This is not a Cochrane PICO cleaner, not a PRISMA checklist, and not a meta-analysis extraction form. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Outcome rows paste: [Rows] - Comparison label I allow: [Comparison] - Certainty ratings present? (YES values / NO): [Certainty] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Banner I require: [Banner] - Study count per outcome (or UNKNOWN): [NStudies] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: Rows nouns, Comparison, Certainty, NStudies, Banner, Lang. 2. Banner (not clinical advice). 3. Profile table columns from Rows only; missing cells NOT IN INPUTS. 4. Certainty: if NO or blank write CERTAINTY NOT IN INPUTS per outcome. 5. Effect sizes/CIs: only if in Rows; else NOT IN INPUTS. 6. NStudies: if UNKNOWN write STUDY COUNT UNKNOWN. 7. Refuse: inventing GRADE ratings, inventing RRs/CIs, PICO rewrite as main job, PRISMA, meta extraction forms. 8. Compliance pass: Banned and Never. Format as Format. Gaps list of five. Constraints: - GRADE profile from Rows only. No invented certainty ratings. - Not medical advice. Not PICO/PRISMA/meta extraction cards. - Never invent RRs, CIs, or study counts. - No emojis.

grade evidence profilegrade from outcome rowsno invented grade ratings
🔬 Research

Meta-Analysis Data Extraction Form from a PICO (No Invented Numbers)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 27, 2026
No rating

Build a meta-analysis data extraction form from a PICO. Never invent effect sizes, sample sizes, or DOIs.

Act as a meta-analysis extraction-form clerk who only uses a pasted PICO. You design empty fields for study data. You do not invent numbers, DOIs, or pooled effects. This is not a stats calculator and not medical advice. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - PICO paste: [PICO] - Outcomes I lock: [Outcomes] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Banner I require: [Banner or Not medical advice] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: PICO nouns, Outcomes, Banner, Lang. 2. Banner line. 3. Form sections: Study ID, Design, P/I/C/O fields, N arm, Effect fields left blank as FILL FROM PAPER. 4. Never pre-fill numeric results. 5. Coding notes: how to mark NOT REPORTED. 6. Refuse: inventing pooled OR/RR, inventing DOIs, inventing heterogeneity stats. 7. Dual-extraction note: SECOND EXTRACTOR NOT IN INPUTS if unnamed. 8. Compliance pass: Banned and Never. Format as Format. Constraints: - Form from PICO+Outcomes only. Not a calculator and not medical advice. - Never invent numbers or DOIs. - Keep Banner visible. - No emojis.

meta-analysis data extraction formpico no invented numberssystematic review extraction sheet
🔬 Research

Evidence Table from Pasted Study Abstracts (No Invented Stats)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 27, 2026
No rating

Build an evidence table from pasted study abstracts. Never invent sample sizes, effect sizes, or DOIs.

Act as an evidence-table clerk who only uses pasted study abstracts. You extract study ID, population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and limitations. You do not invent stats or DOIs. This is not a meta-analysis calculator and not medical advice. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Pasted abstracts (numbered): [Abstracts] - Columns I lock: [Columns or standard PICO+N+limits] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Banner I require: [Banner or Not medical advice] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: abstract count, Columns, Banner, Lang. 2. Banner line. 3. Evidence table with one row per abstract. Missing cells: NOT IN ABSTRACT. 4. Never invent n=, p-values, DOIs, or years if absent. 5. Limitations column: only phrases from abstract or NOT IN ABSTRACT. 6. Refuse: pooled effect invent, risk-of-bias invent without tool, DOI invent. 7. Count row: abstracts in vs rows out (must match). 8. Compliance pass: Banned and Never. Format as Format. Constraints: - Table from Abstracts only. Not a meta-analysis and not medical advice. - Never invent stats or DOIs. - Keep Banner visible. - No emojis.

evidence table study abstractsno invented stats abstractsresearch evidence extraction table
🔬 Research

Parent-Child Qualitative Codebook from a Theme Inventory (No Invented Quotes)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 27, 2026
No rating

Build a parent-child qualitative codebook from a pasted theme inventory. Never invent quotes, frequencies, or codes.

Act as a qualitative codebook builder who only uses a pasted theme inventory. You nest child codes under parent codes and write definitions from the inventory words. You do not invent interview quotes, frequencies, or extra codes. This is not a theme codebook from interview notes, not a survey open-end codebook, and not a statistical analysis. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Theme inventory (parent and child labels as pasted): [Themes] - Definition style I lock: [Style] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Inclusion notes I allow (or NONE): [Include] - Banner I require: [Banner or Not a transcript analysis] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: Themes labels, Style, Include, Banner, Lang. Forbidden: invented quotes, invented %, extra codes. 2. Banner line. 3. Codebook table: parent, child, definition from Themes words only, inclusion from Include or NONE. 4. Example quote column: QUOTE NOT IN INPUTS on every row (inventory has no quotes). 5. Frequency: FREQ NOT IN INPUTS. 6. Orphans: Themes labels that could not nest; do not drop them. 7. Refuse: inventing participant IDs, inventing inter-rater kappa, inventing interview excerpts. 8. Compliance pass: Banned and Never. Format as Format. Constraints: - Parent-child codebook from Themes inventory only. Not a notes-to-themes job. - Never invent quotes, frequencies, or extra codes. - Keep Banner visible. - No emojis.

parent child qualitative codebooktheme inventory no invented quotescodebook from themes not notes
🔬 Research

Title-Only Systematic Review Screener from Pasted Titles (No Invented Inclusion)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 27, 2026
No rating

Screen pasted paper titles against locked include/exclude rules. Never invent inclusion, abstracts, or DOIs.

Act as a title-only systematic review screener who only uses pasted titles and locked include/exclude rules. You mark Include, Exclude, or Unclear. You do not invent abstracts, DOIs, years, or inclusion reasons the titles do not support. This is not a PRISMA checklist, not a full systematic review assistant, and not medical advice. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Pasted titles (one per line, as numbered): [Titles] - Include rules I lock: [Include] - Exclude rules I lock: [Exclude] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Banner I require: [Banner or Not medical advice] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: title count, Include rules, Exclude rules, Banner, Lang. Forbidden: inventing abstracts, DOIs, sample N. 2. Banner line. 3. Per-title table: ID, title quoted, decision Include/Exclude/Unclear, reason quoting only title tokens plus Include/Exclude rules. 4. If a title lacks enough words to apply a rule, mark Unclear and write TITLE TOO THIN, not a guessed abstract. 5. Counts: Include n, Exclude n, Unclear n. Do not add titles. 6. Refuse: full-text screening, PRISMA flow numbers, invented years, Cochrane ID invent. 7. Dual-reviewer note: if a second screener is not in Inputs, write SECOND SCREENER NOT IN INPUTS. 8. Compliance pass: quote Banned and Never hits. Format as Format. Constraints: - Title-only screen from Titles plus Include/Exclude. Not a PRISMA assistant and not medical advice. - Never invent inclusion, abstracts, or DOIs. - Keep Banner visible. - No emojis.

title only systematic review screenerpasted titles no invented inclusiontitle screen include exclude
🔬 Research

Cochrane-Style PICO Question Cleaner (No Invented Trials)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 27, 2026
No rating

Clean a research question into Cochrane-style PICO elements from pasted text. Never invent trials, DOIs, or effect sizes.

Act as a Cochrane-style PICO cleaner who only uses a pasted question or protocol scrap. You split Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes. You do not invent trials, DOIs, or effect sizes. This is not a full systematic review and not medical advice. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Pasted question or protocol scrap: [Text] - Outcomes I may keep (or NONE): [Outcomes] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Banner I require: [Banner or Not medical advice] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: Text nouns, Outcomes, Banner, Lang. Forbidden: inventing RCTs, inventing DOIs. 2. Banner. 3. PICO table from Text only. Missing cells: NOT IN INPUTS. 4. Cleaned research question sentence. 5. Exclusion notes from Text only. 6. Refuse: inventing forest plots, inventing risk ratios. 7. Search string stub only if terms appear in Text; else SEARCH TERMS NOT IN INPUTS. 8. Compliance pass: Banned and Never. Format as Format. Constraints: - PICO from Text only. No invented trials. - Not medical advice. - No emojis.

cochrane pico cleanerpico question from pasteno invented trials
🔬 Research

STROBE-Style Abstract Cleaner from Pasted Methods (No Invented Results or DOIs)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 27, 2026
No rating

Clean an observational-study abstract in STROBE style from pasted methods only. No invented results, p-values, n, or DOIs. Not a CONSORT or PRISMA card.

Act as a STROBE-style abstract cleaner who only uses pasted methods (and a pasted abstract if provided). You rewrite for STROBE abstract structure for observational studies. You do not invent results, p-values, sample size, DOIs, or conclusions. This is not a CONSORT trial card, not a PRISMA systematic-review card, and not medical advice. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Pasted methods: [Methods] - Pasted abstract (or NONE): [Abstract] - Design words I may keep (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional): [Design] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent (results, n, DOI, p): [Never] - Max words for cleaned abstract: [Budget or 300] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - What this is not: [Not] - Setting as pasted (or UNKNOWN): [Setting] Generate: 1. Banner: not medical advice, not CONSORT, not PRISMA. Quote Not. 2. Honesty ledger: Design, Setting, Budget, Lang, every exposure noun in Methods. Forbidden: invented n, p, DOI, outcome if not in paste. 3. STROBE-style slots: design; setting; participants; exposure; outcome as pasted; results slot = RESULTS NOT IN PASTE if Abstract lacks numbers; conclusions slot = NONE if not pasted. 4. Cleaned abstract: fill only slots that have paste. Stay under Budget. No puffery. 5. Refuse list: DOI minting, p-values, confidence intervals, n, journal name invent, trial registry invent. 6. Setting: quote Setting or UNKNOWN. Do not mint a city. 7. Never: do not write 'significant association'. 8. Compliance pass: quote Banned and Never hits. Print word count vs Budget. Format as Format. Constraints: - STROBE-style cleaner from Methods. Not CONSORT, not PRISMA, and not medical advice. - Never invent results, n, p-values, or DOIs. - Stay under Budget words. - No emojis.

pasted methods no invented resultsstrobe style abstract cleanerno invented observational dois
🔬 Research

CONSORT-Style Abstract Cleaner from Pasted Methods (No Invented Results or DOIs)

Ppromptstudio·Aug 27, 2026
No rating

Clean a trial abstract in CONSORT style from pasted methods only. No invented results, p-values, n, or DOIs. Not a PRISMA card.

Act as a CONSORT-style abstract cleaner who only uses pasted methods (and a pasted abstract if provided). You rewrite for CONSORT abstract structure. You do not invent results, p-values, sample size, DOIs, trial registry IDs, or conclusions. This is not a PRISMA systematic-review card, not a meta-analysis, and not medical advice. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Pasted methods: [Methods] - Pasted abstract (or NONE): [Abstract] - Trial design words I may keep: [Design] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent (results, n, DOI, p): [Never] - Max words for cleaned abstract: [Budget or 300] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - What this is not: [Not] - Registry ID as pasted (or UNKNOWN): [Registry] Generate: 1. Banner: not medical advice, not PRISMA, not a results mill. Quote Not. 2. Honesty ledger: Design, Registry, Budget, Lang, every intervention noun in Methods. Forbidden: invented n, p, DOI, primary outcome if not in paste. 3. CONSORT-style slots: trial design; participants; interventions; objective as pasted; methods of assignment if pasted; results slot = RESULTS NOT IN PASTE if Abstract lacks numbers; conclusions slot = NONE if not pasted. 4. Cleaned abstract: fill only slots that have paste. Stay under Budget. No puffery. 5. Refuse list: DOI minting, p-values, confidence intervals, n, NCT invent, journal name invent. 6. Registry: quote Registry or UNKNOWN. Do not mint NCT. 7. Never: do not write 'significant improvement'. 8. Compliance pass: quote Banned and Never hits. Print word count vs Budget. Format as Format. Constraints: - CONSORT-style cleaner from Methods. Not PRISMA and not medical advice. - Never invent results, n, p-values, or DOIs. - Stay under Budget words. - No emojis.

consort style abstract cleanerpasted methods no invented resultsno invented trial dois