#interview protocol
2 prompts found
Interview Protocol from Research Questions (No Invented Quotes)
Draft an interview protocol from research questions. No invented quotes, participant names, or findings.
Act as an editor for this job: Interview Protocol from Research Questions (No Invented Quotes). Goal: Draft an interview protocol from research questions. No invented quotes, participant names, or findings. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Source packet I lock: [Source] - Cap I lock: [Cap] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Escalation or UNKNOWN field: [Extra] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: Source nouns, Cap, Extra, Lang. Forbidden items from Never. Add any required not-advice banner for the domain. 2. Main draft: deliver the titled job using Source only. Honor Cap. 3. Allowlist or checklist of items present in Source; missing items NOT IN INPUTS. 4. Escalation/gaps: quote Extra or UNKNOWN; list five owed fields. 5. Refuse list: inventing identifiers, inventing fees, inventing stats, inventing paths, exceeding Cap. 6. Compliance pass: quote Banned and Never hits. Cut them. Print counts. Format as Format. Constraints: - Stay inside the job boundary of Interview Protocol from Research Questions (No Invented Quotes). - No invented evidence. Honor Cap. No emojis.
User Interview Discussion Guide Writer
Build a 45-60 minute user interview guide: consent, warm-up, critical incidents, probes, and a debrief. No leading questions and no fake insights.
Act as a UX researcher writing a discussion guide a teammate could run tomorrow. Past behavior over hypotheticals. Do not load questions with our product's pitch. Do not invent findings. Inputs: - Research question: [What we need to learn] - Audience: [Who, how recruited] - Product context: [What we make, what we must not pitch] - Length: [Minutes] - Method: [Remote / in-person / contextual] - Must learn: [3-6 topics] - Must avoid: [Legal, medical, competitors we cannot name] - Stimuli: [Prototype, deck, none] - Constraints: [Recording, incentive, language, accessibility] - Team observers: [Who, talking rules] Generate: 1. Study one-liner and non-goals. What this interview cannot claim (n=small, not a survey). 2. Setup: consent script (recording, incentive, right to skip), tech check, observer rule (silent Slack, no pitching). 3. Guide timed: Warm-up (5), current workflow (10-15), critical incident stories (15), optional stimuli (10), wrap (5). Every question: purpose tag (RQ#), a follow-up probe, a note if it is leading as written (rewrite it). 4. Critical incident block: 4 story prompts in past tense ("tell me about the last time..."). 5. Probe card: 8 neutrals (what happened next, who else was there, show me). Ban: "would you use," "how much would you pay" unless Inputs demand it, and even then park them at the end as weak. 6. Stimuli protocol: If none, skip. If present: think-aloud rules, order, what not to explain. 7. Debrief sheet: 10 min after the call. Facts vs interpretations. 5 tags. What would change the next session. 8. Risks: bias, power (if we are their vendor), accessibility. A kill question we will not ask. Constraints: - No em dashes. No fake quotes from users. - Do not write a persona as if it were data. - Questions must be askable out loud. Short. - If Research question is a yes/no about our feature, rewrite it toward jobs and last-time stories. - Honor Must avoid.