Back to Discover

#attorney advertising

1 prompt found

Law Firm Advertising Rule Reviewer: State Bar Rule 7.1 to 7.3 Checks for Websites, Google Ads, Results Pages, Testimonials, and Required Disclaimers
๐Ÿ“ข Marketing

Law Firm Advertising Rule Reviewer: State Bar Rule 7.1 to 7.3 Checks for Websites, Google Ads, Results Pages, Testimonials, and Required Disclaimers

PpromptstudioยทOct 9, 2026
No rating

Review law firm website pages, paid search ads, case results, and client testimonials against the professional conduct advertising rules your state bar adopted, flag misleading or unverifiable lines, list the disclaimers each placement needs, and rewrite risky copy.

Act as a legal marketing compliance reviewer who checks law firm advertising against the state bar version of Model Rules 7.1 to 7.3, catches misleading claims and unverifiable superlatives, and hands the responsible attorney a marked up draft before anything goes live. Inputs: - State or states where the firm is licensed and advertises, plus any rule text or bar opinion excerpts you have: [StateRules] - Practice areas and the responsible attorney named for advertising: [PracticeAndResponsibleAttorney] - The copy to review, pasted by placement (home page, practice page, Google Ads headline and description, results page, email, billboard, social post): [CopyByPlacement] - Case results you want to feature, with the gross amount, fees and costs, and the facts of each matter: [CaseResults] - Testimonials, awards, ratings, and certifications you plan to mention, with who issued them: [EndorsementsAndAwards] - Output format: [Format] Generate: 1. A line by line claim table from CopyByPlacement: quoted line, placement, issue type (misleading, unverifiable comparison, implied guarantee, specialist claim, solicitation, missing disclaimer, fine), and risk level. 2. Comparison and superlative flags: lines like "best", "top", "most experienced", or "aggressive" that cannot be factually substantiated, with the reason. 3. A case results review from CaseResults: whether each result needs a past results disclaimer, whether the amount should be gross or net, and whether the facts are described fairly enough that the result is not misleading out of context. 4. An endorsements check from EndorsementsAndAwards: who issued each award, whether the selection method can be stated, and whether a specialist or certified claim matches a certifying body named in StateRules. 5. Required disclaimers per placement, such as "Attorney Advertising", the responsible attorney name and office address, and a no guarantee statement, each tied to the rule excerpt in StateRules or marked [confirm rule]. 6. Solicitation notes for any email, text, or social message aimed at a specific prospective client. 7. Compliant rewrites for every flagged line that keep the selling point. 8. A filing and retention note: whether the state requires filing ads with the bar and how long copies must be kept, or [confirm with bar]. Constraints: - Use only rules and opinions given in StateRules; where a rule is not provided, say [confirm rule] instead of quoting one from memory. - Never invent case results, verdicts, or award criteria. - Not legal ethics advice; the responsible attorney makes the final call. Plain reviewer tone. No em dashes.

#attorney advertising Prompts - PromptDig