Praxis PLT Scenario Outline from Competency Tags (No Exam Dump, Not Advice)

Prompt

Act as a Praxis Principles of Learning and Teaching scenario outline writer who only uses pasted competency tags. You write practice-scenario outlines the tags already support. You do not dump released items and do not invent ETS codes or score cutoffs. This is practice outlining only, not teaching advice, not an IEP, and not a live-exam leak.
You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs.

Inputs:
- Competency tags I lock: [Tags]
- Grade band I lock: [Band]
- Scenario count I lock: [Count]
- Words I must not use: [Banned]
- What I must never invent (released stems, ETS codes, cut scores, student PHI): [Never]
- Output format: [Format]
- Language: [Lang]
- Test code I may quote (or UNKNOWN): [Code]

Generate:
1. Honesty ledger: Tags, Band, Count, Code, Lang. Forbidden: invented stems, ETS codes, cut scores, PHI. Banner: not an exam dump; not teaching advice; not an IEP.
2. For each scenario (at most Count): setting grounded in Band; dilemma tied to a Tag; reflection prompts (not answer keys from memory).
3. Tag map: each scenario to a tag from Tags only. Unused tags stay unused rather than inventing scenarios.
4. Anti-dump note: refuse pasting recalled items; Code UNKNOWN stays UNKNOWN.
5. Refuse list: inventing a released constructed-response, inventing 5622, inventing a cut score, inventing a student name.
6. Compliance pass: quote Banned and Never hits. Cut them. Print Count. Format as Format.

Constraints:
- Outlines from Tags and Band only. No dump. Not advice.
- Honor Count. No emojis.

Instructions

Replace every [bracket] with your details before running. Works on ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

Generated Output

This image was generated using the prompt above.

Praxis PLT Scenario Outline from Competency Tags (No Exam Dump, Not Advice) - Result

Examples

Example Input

Tags: classroom management as pasted; instructional planning as pasted. Assessment design NOT IN INPUTS. ETS competency code NONE.
Band: grades 5-9 as pasted
Count: 2
Banned: guaranteed pass, brain dump, released item, cut score 160
Never: invent released stems, invent ETS codes, invent cut scores, invent student PHI
Format: ledger + scenarios + map + anti-dump + refuse + compliance
Lang: English
Code: UNKNOWN (do not invent 5622)

Example Output

1. Ledger. Tags: classroom management; instructional planning. Assessment design NOT IN INPUTS. ETS code NONE. Band grades 5-9. Count 2. Code UNKNOWN. Lang English. Banner: not an exam dump; not teaching advice; not an IEP. Forbidden: released stems, ETS codes, cut scores, PHI, guaranteed pass, brain dump, released item, cut score 160.

2. Scenario 1 (classroom management).
Setting: grades 5-9 classroom as pasted; school name NOT IN INPUTS; student names REDACT / not invented.
Dilemma outline: a group work block runs long and two students talk over directions as a practice prompt only; no real student data.
Reflection prompts: What routine from Tags (classroom management) could be planned next? What information is still NOT IN INPUTS?
Scenario 2 (instructional planning).
Setting: same band. Dilemma outline: a lesson objective is unclear before a lab as practice framing only.
Reflection prompts: How would instructional planning tag apply? Materials list NOT IN INPUTS.

3. Tag map. Scenario1 -> classroom management. Scenario2 -> instructional planning. Assessment design unused (NOT IN INPUTS). Code 5622 not assigned (UNKNOWN/NONE).

4. Anti-dump. No recalled constructed-response paste. Code UNKNOWN. Not teaching advice; verify against official ETS materials the user supplies later.

5. Refuse. Released item paste: refused. 5622 invent: refused. Cut score 160: refused. Student name invent: refused. Guaranteed pass: refused.

6. Compliance. Banned hits none. Count 2/2. Format ledger+scenarios+map+anti-dump+refuse+compliance. Gaps: assessment tag facts, ETS code, materials list, school context, official objectives paste.

Missing-data policy: if a field was blank, write NOT IN INPUTS rather than guessing. Lock any tool version named in Inputs; if unnamed, write unknown. No invented testimonials, star ratings, or press logos. If legal, clinical, insurance, HR, education-plan, or veterinary content appears, add a one-line not-advice and de-identify banner. Quote banned-word hits and cut them. End with a gaps list of five bullets the user still owes you. Character and byte caps in the job are hard; print counts when relevant. Refuse to backfill DOIs, exam dumps, PHI, PII, or compensation promises not in Inputs.