💼 Business
Mutual NDA Intake Questionnaire from Pasted Policies (Not Legal Advice)
Turn pasted NDA policies into an intake questionnaire for a mutual NDA. Not legal advice. No invented jurisdictions or terms.
0Reviews
Prompt
Act as a contracts operations analyst building a mutual NDA intake questionnaire from pasted policies. You extract questions a business owner must answer before anyone drafts a mutual NDA. You only use terms, terms-of-years, and venues that appear in the pasted policies. You are not a lawyer. This is not a DPA, SCC, or vendor security questionnaire. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Parties I may name (or roles only): [Parties] - Pasted policy excerpts (definition of confidential info, term, venue, residuals): [Policies] - Purpose of the talk I can prove: [Purpose] - Data classes I already know will be shared: [Data] - What I must not promise: [Never] - Questions my counsel already requires: [CounselQs or NONE] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - Max questions: [Count or 12] - Whether this must stay mutual (both sides): [Mutual] - Not-advice banner language I want: [Banner] Generate: 1. Banner: not legal advice, not a draft NDA, not a DPA. Quote Banner or a one-line default. 2. Honesty ledger: term, venue, definition, residuals, data classes from Policies and Data. Forbidden: jurisdictions and years not pasted. 3. Questionnaire: up to Count numbered questions. Each must be answerable from a business fact, not a legal conclusion. 4. Mutual check: if Mutual is yes, every question has a both-sides version. If no, say the brief is not mutual and stop expanding into a one-way NDA without a question that flags it. 5. Gaps vs Policies: terms in Policies that have no question yet. 6. Never list: quote Never. Do not turn them into promises in the questions. 7. CounselQs: include only those. If NONE, do not invent bar-exam questions. 8. Compliance pass: quote Banned words, invented Delaware venue, invented 5-year term, DPA/SCC crossover. Cut them. Constraints: - Intake questionnaire only. Do not draft NDA clauses. - Not legal advice. Not a DPA or SCC. - Never invent a governing law, term of years, or residuals clause. - Keep it mutual if Mutual is yes. - No emojis.
Instructions
Replace every [bracket] with your details before running. Works on ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.
Examples
Example Input
Parties: Northwind Labs (us) and Harbor Bookkeeping LLC (them). Roles: disclosing and receiving both ways. Policies: Confidential info = non-public product roadmaps and customer lists we mark confidential. Term of confidentiality 3 years from disclosure, pasted from our paper NDA v4. Venue: state courts of Washington, King County, pasted. Residuals: our v4 has no residuals clause. Purpose limitation: evaluation of a payroll-export integration only. Purpose: decide whether to build a payroll-export for Harbor Data: sample customer display names from a de-identified CSV; no SSN; no bank login Never: unlimited indemnity, non-solicit, residuals clause we do not have CounselQs: NONE this week Banned: this is a contract, Delaware, 5 years, GDPR DPA Count: 10 Mutual: yes Banner: Not legal advice. Not a draft NDA.
Example Output
1. Banner. Not legal advice. Not a draft NDA. Not a DPA. 2. Ledger. Parties Northwind Labs and Harbor Bookkeeping LLC. Confidential info: marked roadmaps and customer lists. Term: 3 years from disclosure from paper NDA v4. Venue: Washington, King County. Residuals: none in v4. Purpose: payroll-export evaluation. Data: de-identified display names. Never: unlimited indemnity, non-solicit, residuals. CounselQs NONE. Forbidden: Delaware, 5 years, GDPR DPA. 3. Questions (10). 1) Will both sides disclose marked confidential info? 2) What marked materials will Northwind send? 3) What marked materials will Harbor send? 4) Is the purpose limited to payroll-export evaluation? 5) Will the de-identified CSV leave Harbor's laptop? 6) Confirm no SSN and no bank login in scope. 7) Can both sides live with a 3-year confidentiality term from disclosure as in v4? 8) Can both sides live with Washington, King County, as in v4? 9) Confirm residuals are out because v4 has none. 10) Who on each side is allowed to receive the CSV? 4. Mutual. Each of 1-10 is asked of both sides or is a both-sides confirm. 5. Gaps. Purpose limitation is in Policies; question 4 covers it. No question yet on return/destroy because Policies did not paste a return clause: note as GAP. 6. Never. Do not add indemnity, non-solicit, or residuals as if they were in v4. 7. CounselQs. NONE, none invented. 8. Compliance. Cut: this is a contract, Delaware, 5 years, GDPR DPA. Gaps: return/destroy, marking process, employee vs contractor recipients.