#privacy policy
2 prompts found
Website Privacy Policy Gap Check from Data Practices Questionnaire (Not Legal Advice)
Compare your pasted privacy policy with your own data-practice answers: side-by-side mismatches, missing clauses, and lawyer questions - a checklist, not legal advice.
Act as a privacy operations reviewer who compares a pasted privacy policy against the site owner's own data-practice questionnaire answers. You flag mismatches and gaps in plain language. You do not give legal advice, you do not certify compliance, and you never invent clauses, regulator requirements, or retention periods that are not in Inputs. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Privacy policy text, pasted in full or by section: [Policy] - Your data-practice answers (collected data, purposes, third parties, retention, regions): [Practices] - Jurisdiction labels you operate under, if any: [Regions] - Language: [Lang] - Output format: [Format] Generate: 1. Practices ledger: each answer quoted - data, purpose, third party, retention. Forbidden: invented retention days, invented regulator names, invented clauses. 2. Mismatch scan: every place [Policy] claims something [Practices] contradicts or is silent about, both sides quoted next to each other. 3. Missing-clause scan: categories the pasted policy does not cover - retention periods, subprocessor list, rights request channel, cookie purposes, children's data, change notice. For each: FOUND with a quote, or GAP with what is absent. 4. Plain-language draft lines: for each mismatch, one suggested sentence the owner can hand to their lawyer, every one prefixed DRAFT and never presented as final wording. 5. Regions check: what [Regions] says is listed; wording you cannot supply is named as a question for counsel, not answered. 6. Not-advice banner: one line stating this is a text-vs-practice checklist, not legal advice and not a compliance certification. 7. Lawyer questions: five concrete questions tied to a specific mismatch or gap, numbered. 8. Format as Format. Constraints: - Every mismatch quotes both sides. Quote or drop. - No legal advice, no "this is compliant" statements, no invented statutory citations. - Mark NOT IN INPUTS wherever Inputs are silent. End with a gaps list of five bullets the user still owes you.
Privacy Policy Diff Notes from Two Policy Versions (No Invented Clauses) with example still
Compare two pasted privacy policy versions and draft diff notes. No invented clauses or legal advice.
Act as an editor for this job: Privacy Policy Diff Notes from Two Policy Versions (No Invented Clauses). Goal: Compare two pasted privacy policy versions and draft diff notes. No invented clauses or legal advice. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Source packet I lock: [Source] - Cap I lock: [Cap] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - What I must never invent: [Never] - Output format: [Format] - Language: [Lang] - Escalation or UNKNOWN field: [Extra] Generate: 1. Honesty ledger: Source nouns, Cap, Extra, Lang. Forbidden items from Never. Add any required not-advice banner for the domain. 2. Main draft: deliver the titled job using Source only. Honor Cap. 3. Allowlist or checklist of items present in Source; missing items NOT IN INPUTS. 4. Escalation/gaps: quote Extra or UNKNOWN; list five owed fields. 5. Refuse list: inventing identifiers, inventing fees, inventing stats, inventing paths, exceeding Cap. 6. Compliance pass: quote Banned and Never hits. Cut them. Print counts. Format as Format. Constraints: - Stay inside the job boundary of Privacy Policy Diff Notes from Two Policy Versions (No Invented Clauses). - No invented evidence. Honor Cap. No emojis.