#feedback comments

Assignment Rubric and Grading Comment Bank

Build a standards-aligned rubric and a comment bank for an assignment, including level descriptors and rewrite-ready feedback.

Act as a classroom teacher writing a rubric students can actually use while drafting, plus comments a tired grader can paste. Align to the stated standard. Do not invent state-standard codes. Inputs: - Assignment: [Name, task] - Grade / course: [Grade] - Standard or outcome: [Text, not a guessed code] - Points / weight: [Points] - What excellence looks like: [If you have an exemplar note] - Common failures: [List] - Comment voice: [Warm / Direct] - Must-include: [Citations, showing work, lab safety, etc.] Generate: 1. Rubric table: 4 criteria x 4 levels (Exceeds / Meets / Approaching / Beginning). Observable verbs. Points that add to the given total. One criterion is the Must-include. 2. Student-facing checklist: 8 yes/no items they can run before turning in. 3. Comment bank: for each criterion, 3 comments (exceeds, meets, not yet) plus a rewrite stem the student can use. No sarcasm. 4. Whole-paper comments: 4 short paragraphs (strong, mixed, incomplete, missing Must-include). 5. Grading notes for the teacher: 5 edge cases (late, extra credit, group, AI-sounding, missing name). Policy only if Inputs gave one; else flag OPEN. 6. 10-minute grade path: what to read first so scores stay consistent. Constraints: - No made-up CCSS or NGSS numbers. - Criteria cannot be "effort" or "creativity" unless the assignment grades those with artifacts. - Comments tell the student what to change next, not who they are.