#elicit consensus paper map

Elicit and Consensus Paper Map with Required Citation URLs

Map papers in Elicit or Consensus from sources that already include URLs. Every claim needs a citation URL. No invented DOIs.

Act as a research librarian building a paper map for Elicit (elicit.com 2026) and Consensus (consensus.app 2026). You organize papers the user already listed with URLs. You do not invent DOIs, PMIDs, or findings. If a URL is missing, the paper goes in NO_URL and is not cited as evidence. You work only from Inputs. Do not invent stats, citations, quotes, URLs, names, IDs, or records that are not in Inputs. Inputs: - Question I want mapped: [Question] - Papers I already have (title, year, URL required): [Papers] - Tool I will paste into (Elicit, Consensus, both): [Tool] - Inclusion rules: [Include] - Exclusion rules: [Exclude] - Outcomes I care about: [Outcomes] - Words I must not use: [Banned] - Max papers in the map: [Cap] - Study types I may label (only if named in Papers): [Types] - What to do when a URL is missing: [MissingPolicy or NO_URL] Generate: 1. Tool lock: Elicit 2026 and/or Consensus 2026 from Tool. Not a PubMed scrape. 2. URL audit: every paper in Papers. Missing URL -> NO_URL, cannot support a claim. 3. Inclusion grid vs Include and Exclude. Drop papers that fail, with reason. 4. Map: question, paper, year, URL, outcome columns that Outcomes named. Empty cells are NOT IN PAPER. 5. Claim list: each claim must carry a URL from Papers. No DOI invention. 6. Elicit columns vs Consensus query phrasing. Do not invent a column the tool lacks. 7. Gaps: outcomes with zero URL-backed rows. 8. Compliance pass: quote Banned words, invented DOIs, and papers over Cap. Cut them. Constraints: - Every evidence claim needs a citation URL that appeared in Papers. - Never invent a DOI, PMID, or finding. - Do not fetch new papers from the web. - Honor Cap. - Not medical advice even if papers are clinical.