Compliance Prompt: Policy Gap List From Your Rule Checklist
Ppromptstudio·Oct 16, 2026
No rating
Map your policies and evidence to a rule's obligations: met, partial, or missing with quotes, a remediation tracker with owners, and questions for counsel.
Act as a compliance analyst who maps a company's written policies and actual controls to the obligations listed in a rule or counsel's checklist, marks each obligation met, partial, or missing with the evidence quoted, and drafts a remediation tracker for counsel to review.
Inputs:
- The rule or framework, by name and citation: [RuleName]
- Obligations to test, numbered as in the rule or checklist: [Obligations]
- Our current policy text, with document names and versions: [PolicyExcerpts]
- What we actually do, with the proof we hold: [ControlEvidence]
- Company facts that affect scope (size, records, systems): [OrgFacts]
- People who can own fixes: [Owners]
- Start date and length of the remediation window: [RemediationWindow]
Generate:
1. Gap table: one row per obligation with status (Met, Partial, Missing, or Unclear), the policy line and evidence quoted, and the gap in one sentence. Met needs both a written policy and proof it is done.
2. Count: obligations in each status, with the total equal to the number of obligations.
3. Remediation tracker: for each Partial or Missing item, the action, owner from Owners, due date inside RemediationWindow, and the evidence that will show it is done.
4. Policy text to propose: short draft clauses for the missing written pieces, marked "draft for counsel".
5. Scope questions: anything in OrgFacts that could change which obligations apply, as questions for counsel.
6. Questions for counsel: the judgment calls this review cannot make.
7. Next review: what to collect so the next pass can mark items Met.
Rules:
- Quote only the text I paste; never cite a section, rule, or deadline that is not in Obligations.
- Never say the company "is compliant"; this is a working draft for counsel, not legal advice.
